Let the city be more friendly to the car
Recently, People's Daily Online Data Center announced the "2018 China's 25 key cities in the network about car tolerance." According to the local network car policy, the number of platforms, the degree of public opinion recognition, etc., the rankings are comprehensively evaluated. The Chengdu, Sanya and Wuxi network cars are ranked as the top three in terms of “tolerance ranking” because the “threshold” is relatively loose. Qingdao, Chongqing and Dalian are more stringent.
In July 2016, the State Council promulgated the “Guiding Opinions on Promoting the Healthy Development of the Taxi Industry”, which enabled the controversial network car to obtain legal status. After two years of policy landing and running-in, the network car is gradually becoming an important part of public transportation from “destroying innovators”, and the functional departments are also shifting from emergency management to daily management. A fairer access to the car, more realistic management measures in line with the market, and the principle of equality as equal.
Judging from this inclusive ranking, Sanya and Wuxi do not have any wheelbase or displacement requirements for the network car, only local licenses, local household registration or residence permits, etc.; low. However, some cities have set stricter household registration, license, price, displacement, wheelbase, and vehicle requirements for the network. The final ranking of Qingdao has set a minimum requirement, and even the overall fuel consumption of the car. Also accepted as an access standard.
"One city, one policy" is the basic framework of China's network car policy, but you also have to ask: The high-standard large-displacement, large-wheelbase network car that was originally set up is serving the public in reality, or Only exist in the file?
Gordon Turlock, the father of public choice theory, has devoted himself to the consequences of regulatory policies. Once regulation has created a scarcity, it is difficult to eliminate this scarcity, and even worse, because of inappropriate scarcity. Existence, resulting in a lack of flexibility in supply prices, market participants (whether consumers, or businesses) who can not get this profit. After two years of full legalization of China's network car, after the implementation of the network car standard in 210 cities in China, what is the original intention of these distances and displacement standards set at the beginning of the re-establishment? At the original goal, did anyone create unreasonable "scarcity," and the existence of those high thresholds did not hinder the efficiency of the market.
Some scholars have made a PMC (Policy Modeling Consistency) "index model" analysis on the network car policy of major cities. It is found that the regulation of the network car policy and the regulatory effect are constrained by the traffic congestion index and population density. In other words, if the regulatory power is too strong, it may cause traffic congestion and inconvenience to the citizens.
But it does not constitute a crime of looting, does not mean that the Leica driver will not be suspected of other crimes. According to the provisions of Article 269 of the Criminal Law, if you commit a crime of looting and use violence or threaten violence on the spot to resist arrest, you shall be convicted of the crime of robbery. In this case, the toll station staff said that they had tried to intercept the vehicle involved and set up a roadblock in the middle of the road. However, the vehicle involved not only did not slow down, but instead rushed away from the staff and even crashed into the collision avoidance set by the toll station staff. sandbag. If the toll station staff's statement is true, then the driver's behavior is likely to have been converted from snatching to robbery. The crime of robbery is a crime of conduct and does not require a "large amount" to be guilty.